fokipt.blogg.se

Brian moneymoney money
Brian moneymoney money





brian moneymoney money

Sex itself was somewhat private and taboo, mostly for understandable reasons further than Victorian prudence: venereal disease and unexpected pregnancy were lethal. Why Are These Men Important?īefore the 1950s, "sex education" was extremely controversial. Many of these men - such as paedophile rapist Michel Foucault - seemed to have been hellbent on using academic theory to justify their horrifying sociopathy and its ghastly sexual expression. However, if you take a look at the men behind the ideas, what you find is so repulsive it would damage any reasonable person's adoption of them as orthodoxy. These "fathers of the Sexual Revolution" form the intellectual and supposedly moral basis of modern thinking around gender and sexuality. The only thing I’m sure about is that he wants to use his swan song to talk about all of this.You'd be forgiven for not knowing who these two people were, and there's a reason you don't. For starters, Stelter’s last show is on Sunday. But this is one where we definitely need to see how it plays out. I hate saying “wait and see” at the end of stories like this.

brian moneymoney money

Then again, there’s certainly a way to reduce costs while adding people: You let go of expensive people and replace them with cheaper ones. And CNN spokesman Matt Dornic told me that the news service is under no pressure from its new owner to reduce headcount, noting that Licht has said he wants to hire more journalists. In which case, Stelter’s departure could be the first of many, and we’ll spend less time worrying about CNN’s politics and more time worrying about its ability to provide first-class news coverage.ĬNN says both of those theories are wrong: It says Licht got rid of Stelter and Reliable Sources because it wants different programming on Sunday mornings. Under Zaslav/Licht, CNN has already made one significant cut: Killing off CNN+, its brand-new streaming service, weeks after it launched (disclosure: My editor and I are producers on a show Vox Media made for CNN+).īut that may not be anything close to enough to help the parent company hit its numbers. David Zaslav - but not a huge draw for normals. So Stelter, who reportedly made close to $1 million a year, was an easy cut: His show, along with his daily media newsletter, was a big deal in media circles - see this “Pet of the Day” submission from.

#Brian moneymoney money movie

We’ve already seen signs of budget-cutting in the company’s entertainment properties - like shelving a Batgirl movie instead of releasing it and layoffs at HBOMax - but there will be many more cuts to come this fall. 2: It’s the money, stupidĪs I wrote earlier this week, Warner Brothers Discovery has a heavy debt load, but Zaslav has told investors that won’t matter, in part because he’s going to find $3 billion in savings. Then again, maybe they’ll need to let go of a lot of people because of theory No. Alternate theory: They won’t need to let go of anyone else because they’ve made an example of Stelter. But presumably Malone and his managers - Warner Brothers Discovery CEO David Zaslav and Chris Licht, the executive Zaslav hired to replace Zucker - will find other CNN journalists they want off the air as well. So in this theory, Malone believes Stelter represents the excesses of CNN’s coverage. Why billionaire John Malone’s shadow looms over CNN “If I watched CNN via Fox News, I would hate CNN too.” John Malone only watches CNN via Fox News,” says a CNN employee. More to the point: Current and former CNN employees believe Malone’s view of CNN is entirely colored by Fox News. Malone’s politics lean quite right/libertarian, though he was also critical of Donald Trump during his administration. This is the juicy one: In this version of events, Stelter is the victim of John Malone, the billionaire cable magnate and the most powerful investor in Warner Brothers Discovery Inc., which now owns CNN and the rest of what used to be called Time Warner. Crucially, they are not mutually exclusive. But in this case, what happened to Stelter matters because it may tell us a lot about the future of CNN - one of the world’s most powerful news outlets - as well as Warner Brothers Discovery, the company that owns CNN along with some of the world’s most valuable cultural assets. And media reporters - like me - are even guiltier of this. Inside and outside of CNN, there are two working theories.īut before we get there, let’s talk about why we’re talking about Brian Stelter: Yes, people in media care way too much about other people in media. Why was Brian Stelter, CNN’s star media reporter and host of its Reliable Sources show, pushed out of his job this week?







Brian moneymoney money